Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia

CASE REPORT
Year
: 2021  |  Volume : 15  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 199--203

Blind intubation through Laryngeal Mask Airway in a cannot intubate-difficult to ventilate patient with massive hematemesis


Rita Cataldo1, Ivana Zdravkovic2, Zaklina Petrovic3, Ruggero M Corso4, Giuseppe Pascarella1, Massimiliano Sorbello5,  
1 Unit of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, via Álvaro del Portillo 21, Rome, Italy
2 Department of Anesthesia and Reanimation, Clinical Hospital Center “Zvezdara”, Belgrade, Serbia
3 Department of Anesthesia and Reanimation, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Germany
4 Departement of Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Section, “GB Morgagni-L. Pierantoni” Hospital, Forlì, Italy
5 Anesthesia and Intensive Care, AOU Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele, Catania, Italy

Correspondence Address:
Giuseppe Pascarella
Via Alvaro del Portillo 200-00128, Rome
Italy

Abstract

Massive hematemesis could be challenging situation requiring emergency airway control and urgent surgical treatment. We report a case of difficult airway management with blind intubation through Laryngeal Mask Airway in a 56-year-old patient with massive hematemesis. After failed endoscopic attempts to stop bleeding, worsening of hemodynamics called for emergency intubation and surgery. After failed intubation attempts and face-mask ventilation worsening, a classic LMA was used for rescue ventilation and decision was made to intubate through LMA. The airway exchange was aided by a nasogastric tube (NGT) through LMA, confirmed with capnography and surgery was started successfully and uneventfully. Unexpected difficult airway can be extremely challenging situation, especially in emergency settings with no possibility to delay surgery. In those cases, literature suggests different intubating techniques through LMA. Blind intubation through LMA aided by NGT showed to be a suitable option in resources-limited settings, where advanced supraglottic devices and/or optical devices are not available.



How to cite this article:
Cataldo R, Zdravkovic I, Petrovic Z, Corso RM, Pascarella G, Sorbello M. Blind intubation through Laryngeal Mask Airway in a cannot intubate-difficult to ventilate patient with massive hematemesis.Saudi J Anaesth 2021;15:199-203


How to cite this URL:
Cataldo R, Zdravkovic I, Petrovic Z, Corso RM, Pascarella G, Sorbello M. Blind intubation through Laryngeal Mask Airway in a cannot intubate-difficult to ventilate patient with massive hematemesis. Saudi J Anaesth [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Apr 18 ];15:199-203
Available from: https://www.saudija.org/text.asp?2021/15/2/199/312969


Full Text



 Background



Massive hematemesis, especially when related to hemodynamic instability, represents a condition requiring emergency airway control, patient stabilization, and urgent endoscopic or surgical option.

Airway management in such a situation can be challenging because of the emergency setting, high risk for aspiration and limited visibility during maneuvers.[1]

We report a case of difficult airway management in patient requiring emergency surgery for massive hematemesis, discussing adopted strategy with blind/aided intubations through LMAs and reviewing available literature indications and reports in similar situations.

 Case Report



A 52-year-old male obese patient (weight 115 kg, height 181 cm), with history of hypertension, analgesics abuse due to chronic back pain, came to Emergency Department for repeated massive hematemesis episodes. Upon arrival, the patient was conscious, with slightly reduced response to painful stimulation and regularly reflexive pupils; vital signs were recorded: heart rate was 145 bpm, non-invasive blood pressure 80/45 mmHg, SpO2 86% in room air. Blood tests were performed, urinary catheter and indwelling arterial line for blood pressure monitoring and serial blood gas measurements were placed. After anamnesis excluded presence of active liver disease and esophageal varices, the patients signed the informed consent so that a gastric tube was gently positioned to drain blood from stomach, and immediately after a Sengstaken Blackmore tube to in an attempt to stop bleeding.

Emergency endoscopy was arranged and performed with locally sprayed 10% lidocaine and minimal sedation with midazolam 1 mg, resulting in failure to identify and control active source of bleeding with endoscopic treatment. Following the worsening of hemodynamic conditions and impossibility to stop bleeding, immediate surgical access was scheduled. Patient was moved to operatory room and, under vital parameters monitoring and 3 minutes preoxygenation in 100% oxygen, a rapid sequence induction was performed with etomidate 0.2 mg*kg-1, suxamethonium 1 mg*kg-1, and fentanil 100 mcg. Cricoid pressure (CP) was applied in order to decrease the risk of regurgitation. Before the procedure, patient was not carefully studied for airway management, due to urgent setting, but a Mallampati 3 score and slightly reduced neck movement were recorded. At a first direct laryngoscopy, no glottic structures were visible; a second attempt, after aspiration of blood and releasing of CP, showed a Cormack-Lehane 3 grade with partial view of lingual border of epiglottis.

Intubation was attempted blindly twice with styletted tube, unsuccessfully, whereas ventilation by face-mask was getting quickly worse. As the oxygen saturation was descending rapidly (spO2 60%), a number 4 classic LMA was placed after repeated mouth aspiration. Mask was inflated accordingly to manufacturers' instruction (25 ml of air) and manual ventilation was obtained via gentle but frequent insufflation with 100% Oxygen. Once saturation was fully recovered, considering emergency surgery and aspiration risk, the decision to intubate through LMA was taken.

Optical instruments (video/fiberoptical) were not available. We then inserted a 16 Fr standard nasogastric tube (NGT) blindly through LMA, finding indirect sign of passage in trachea in easy advancement without resistance and repeated free air aspiration. Then, we cut proximal tip of NGT and kept granting ventilation passing proximal end of NGT via holed catheter mount. Next, proximal part of LMA with glued connector was cut and removed to allow passage of a 7,5 mm endotracheal tube (ET) through LMA by railroading on NGT [Figure 1].{Figure 1}

Before removing the LMA, the ET cuff was inflated and position confirmed by capnography.

After successful intubation, surgery started and patient was successfully treated for duodenal ulcer. Vital parameters were stable throughout the operation, but blood and plasma transfusion were necessary according to blood test results. At the end of the surgery, the patient was moved to intensive care unit for postoperative monitoring and uneventfully extubated the day after using a safe extubation technique.[2]

 Discussion



Airway management may be particularly challenging during a massive hematemesis scenario, which may lead to a difficulty in the recognition of airway anatomy, increasing the risk for a cannot intubate-cannot ventilate setting.[1]

The existing literature underlines the need for airway examination also in emergency conditions, suggesting the use of simplified scores based on anatomical landmarks, airway obstruction and neck mobility which could quickly and reliably predict difficult airway management also in emergency department.[3]

In our case, the airway examination was abbreviated due to the emergent status and deteriorating clinical conditions.

Our quick evaluation indicated obesity, limited neck extension and a Mallampati 3 score; a careful post-procedural examination showed slightly reduced inter-incisor distance and short neck as predicting factors for difficult laryngoscopy, in addition to active bleeding.[3],[4]

Another factor which could promote more difficult laryngoscopy is application of Cricoid Pressure (CP) during rapid sequence induction. There is much debate in the literature whether or not this maneuver has real effectiveness in terms of aspiration protection in front of clear evidence that it worsens ventilation, laryngoscopy and supraglottic airway devices (SAD) placement.[5]

In this case, we performed rapid sequence induction maintaining CP during the first laryngoscopic attempt; due to failed view, CP was stopped for the second attempt and a Cormack-Lehane 3 was obtained.

Airway Management guidelines support early recurrence to SADs in case of difficult airways,[4],[5],[6],[7] and their use as successful bridge to secure the airways has been remarked also in ASA Closed Claims Analysis.[8] For these reasons, it was our choice after two failed intubation attempts and desaturation to use LMA, with immediate benefit on saturation by an effective ventilation. Subsequently, an intubation through LMA was planned. Literature recommendations for difficult airway management include the choice of 2nd-generation SGA, which guarantee gastric access through the dedicated channel for gastric tube insertion and decompression, in addition to a better sealing pressures and possibility to intubate.[9] Not by chance, they have been recently indicated as rescue devices also in high risk situation for aspiration and emergency surgery.[10]

However, 2nd-generation SGA could be not available in every setting, and it was our case. Furthermore, in our hospital we lacked videolaryngoscopes, which are the first choice in case of unanticipated difficult airway.[11]

This is the first report of blind-aided intubation through classic LMA during a massive hematemesis. The main problem with intubation via LMA is represented by the presence of a glued standard circuit connector limiting the ET diameter and by the tube length, resulting in a difficulty to intubate through it in the adult patient.[12],[13] Newer devices, such as AirQ ® (Mercury Medical, USA) obviate this problem with shorter airway conduit and removable connector,[14],[15] while i-LMA ® (Teleflex Medical, Ireland) was designed with a short airway conduit and dedicated ET with detachable connector, designed to allow intubation with high success rate also with blind technique.[16]

Despite not designed for this purpose, many techniques have been described for intubation through classic LMA,[1] as the LMA-Aintree-fiberoptic combination.[18] The Aintree® (Cook Medical, USA) airway exchange catheter (AEC) is larger and shorter than a conventional airway exchange catheter, allowing introduction of a relatively large diameter flexible bronchoscope (up to 44 mm) and leaving the distal part of the instrument free to move and to operate [Figure 2].{Figure 2}

After LMA introduction, ventilation can be initiated, and a fiberoptic bronchoscope with the pre-mounted AEC can be inserted inside the mask through ventilation port of catheter mount. Visualized introduction of the instrument between vocal cords and into the trachea is mandatory before releasing the AEC inside the LMA and removing the bronchoscope. LMA is then removed leaving in situ the Aintree, which is then used to railroad the tube into trachea with or without help of laryngoscope. Despite being more rarely used, this technique has also been described for ProSeal LMA® also in case of airway anatomy distortion.[19],[20]

The Aintree-fiberoptic technique remains superior compared to blind insertion of AEC[21] or gum elastic bougie (GEB) through LMA,[22] but it requires training to be used,[23] as exchange maneuver could be challenging and fiberoptic skills may be not universally spread.[24]

Blind intubation techniques through LMA report a variable success rate (30-93%),[25] while the most used GEB-aided technique varies from 27.5% to 63%.[22],[26],[27],[28]

The use of NGT has been described by Mathes[29] in combination with LMA Supreme ® (Teleflex Medical, Ireland), although aided by fiberoptic guidance. In our case, NGT was used because of unavailability of AEC, and preferred to GEB because of being hollow, able to allow air aspiration and therefore confirm tracheal positioning through end-tidal CO2 detection.[30] Other alternative is use of guidewire,[17],[31] but this technique is more prone to wire impingement if operated blindly, not allowing any control without contemporary use of fiberoptic bronchoscope.

 Conclusions



Patients with upper digestive tract or airway hemorrhage represent a specific challenge because even in absence of anatomical difficulties for ventilation and laryngoscopy, they could evolve into difficult to ventilate or intubate scenarios. Intubation through SADs in case of rescue ventilation and need for urgent surgery should always be considered and Fiberoptic assisted intubation through 2nd generation SGAs should always be preferred as it is safer and more effective than any blind technique.

However, in case of missing advanced devices, Blind intubation through LMA aided by NGT could be a rescue alternative in emergency in resource-limited settings, despite it not being recommended routinely.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Meltzer AC, Klein JC. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Patient presentation, risk stratification, and early management. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2014;43:665-75.
2Sorbello M, Frova G. When the end is really the end? The extubation in the difficult airway patient. Minerva Anestesiol 2013;79:194-9.
3Reed MJ, Dunn MJ, McKeown DW. Can an airway assessment score predict difficulty at intubation in the emergency department? Emerg Med J 2005;22:99-102.
4Petrini F, Accorsi A, Adrario E, Agro F, Amicucci G, Antonelli M, et al. Recommendations for airway control and difficult airway management. Minerva Anestesiol 2005;71:617-57.
5Sorbello M. Aristotle, Galileo and Sellick: The unsolved dilemma of cricoid pressure. Trends Anaesth Crit Care 2016;6:1-2.
6Frova G, Sorbello M. Algorithms for difficult airway management: A review. Minerva Anestesiol 2009;75:201-9.
7Sorbello M, Afshari A, De Hert S. Device or target? A paradigm shift in airway management: Implications for guidelines, clinical practice and teaching. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2018;35:811-4.
8Peterson GN, Domino KB, Caplan RA, Posner KL, Lee LA, Cheney FW. Management of the difficult airway: A closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 2005;103:33-9.
9Agrò FE, Pascarella G. Extraglottic airway devices: Is the classification in generations really informative of properties and safety? Minerva Anestesiol 2018;84:649-51.
10Sorbello M, Petrini F. Supraglottic airway devices: The search for the best insertion technique or the time to change our point of view? Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 2017;45:76-82.
11Frerk C, Mitchell VS, McNarry AF, Mendonca C, Bhagrath R, Patel A, et al. Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults. Br J Anaesth 2015;115:827-48.
12Goldmann K, Jakob C. A randomized crossover comparison of the size 2 1/2 laryngeal mask airway ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway-Classic in pediatric patients. Anesth Analg 2005;100:1605-10.
13Hansen TG, Joensen H, Henneberg SW, Hole P. Laryngeal mask airway guided tracheal intubation in a neonate with the Pierre Robin syndrome. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1995;39:129-31.
14Jagannathan N, Wong DT. Successful tracheal intubation through an intubating laryngeal airway in pediatric patients with airway hemorrhage. J Emerg Med 2011;41:369-73.
15Shiraishi T. Awake insertion of the air-Q intubating laryngeal airway device that facilitates safer tracheal intubation in morbidly obese patients. Br J Anaesth 2013;111:1024-5.
16Gerstein NS, Braude DA, Hung O, Sanders JC, Murphy MF. The Fastrach intubating laryngeal mask airway: An overview and update. Can J Anaesth 2010;57:588-601.
17Wong DT, Yang JJ, Mak HY, Jagannathan N. Use of intubation introducers through a supraglottic airway to facilitate tracheal intubation: A brief review. Can J Anaesth 2012;59:704-15.
18Hawkins M, O'Sullivan E, Charters P. Fibreoptic intubation using the cuffed oropharyngeal airway and Aintree intubation catheter. Anaesthesia 1998;53:891-4.
19Cook TM, Seller C, Gupta K, Thornton M, O'Sullivan E. Non-conventional uses of the Aintree Intubating Catheter in management of the difficult airway. Anaesthesia 2007;62:169-74.
20Cook TM, Silsby J, Simpson TP. Airway rescue in acute upper airway obstruction using a ProSeal Laryngeal mask airway and an Aintree catheter: A review of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in the management of the difficult airway. Anaesthesia 2005;60:1129-36.
21Chadd GD, Ackers JW, Bailey PM. Difficult intubation aided by the laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia 1989;44:1015.
22Gabbott DA, Sasada MP. Tracheal intubation through the laryngeal mask using a gum elastic bougie in the presence of cricoid pressure and manual in line stabilisation of the neck. Anaesthesia 1996;51:389-90.
23Charters P, O'Sullivan E. The 'dedicated airway': A review of the concept and an update of current practice. Anaesthesia 1999;54:778-86.
24Agro FE, Cataldo R. Teaching fiberoptic intubation in Italy: State of the art. Minerva Anestesiol 2010;76:684-5.
25Barnes DR, Reed DB, Weinstein G, Brown LH. Blind tracheal intubation by paramedics through the LMA-Unique. Prehosp Emerg Care 2003;7:470-3.
26Ahmed AB, Nathanson MH, Gajraj NM. Tracheal intubation through the laryngeal mask airway using a gum elastic bougie: The effect of head position. J Clin Anesth 2001;13:427-9.
27Allison A, McCrory J. Tracheal placement of a gum elastic bougie using the laryngeal mask airways. Anaesthesia 1990;45:419-20.
28Miller JA, Levsky ME, Givens ML, Miller MA. Eschmann introducer through laryngeal mask airway: A cadaveric trial of an alternate means of rescue intubation. West J Emerg Med 2010;11:16-9.
29Mathes AM, Wrobel M, Reus E, Rensing H, Grundmann U. Fiberoptic-guided intubation via the Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme. J Clin Anesth 2008;20:322-3.
30Tanigawa K, Takeda T, Goto E, Tanaka K. The efficacy of esophageal detector devices in verifying tracheal tube placement: A randomized cross-over study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Anesth Analg 2001;92:375-8.
31Sartore DM, Kojima RK. Laryngeal mask airway-assisted, wire-guided fiberoptic tracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 1994;81:1550-1.