Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia

ERRATUM
Year
: 2015  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 235-

0.5% levobupivacaine versus 0.5% ropivacaine: Are they different in ultrasound-guided sciatic block?: Erratum


 

Correspondence Address:




How to cite this article:
. 0.5% levobupivacaine versus 0.5% ropivacaine: Are they different in ultrasound-guided sciatic block?: Erratum.Saudi J Anaesth 2015;9:235-235


How to cite this URL:
. 0.5% levobupivacaine versus 0.5% ropivacaine: Are they different in ultrasound-guided sciatic block?: Erratum. Saudi J Anaesth [serial online] 2015 [cited 2022 Aug 13 ];9:235-235
Available from: https://www.saudija.org/text.asp?2015/9/2/235/152905


Full Text

In the article that appeared on page 3-8 of the Saudi Journal of Anesthesia, Vol. 9, No. 1, January-March, 2015 issue [1] there was an error in authors' first and last name. The author names should be as follows:

Pham Dang Charles, Langlois Cécile, Lambert Chantal, Nguyen Jean-Michel, Asehnoune Karim, Lejus Corinne

Accordingly the citation should be as follows:

Pham Dang C, Langlois C, Lambert C, Nguyen JM, Asehnoune K, Lejus C

Abdelazeem EL-DawlatlyEditor In Chief

References

1Charles PD, Cécile L, Chantal L, Jean-Michel N, Karim A, Corinne L. 0.5% levobupivacaine versus 0.5% ropivacaine: Are they different in ultrasound-guided sciatic block?. Saudi J Anaesth 2015;9:3-8.