Previous article Table of Contents  Next article

LETTERS TO EDITOR
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 16  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 514-516

Subcutaneous tunneling of epidural catheter in four easy steps – A novel technique


1 Department of Anesthesia, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, KSA
2 Department of Anesthesia, Nethradhama Superspeciality Eye Hospital, Jayanagar, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Correspondence Address:
Ferhan Khan
Department of Anesthesia, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University - 12372, Riyadh
KSA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/sja.sja_156_22

Rights and Permissions
Date of Submission16-Feb-2022
Date of Decision16-Feb-2022
Date of Acceptance17-Feb-2022
Date of Web Publication03-Sep-2022
 


How to cite this article:
Khan F, Delvi MB, Karadka VS. Subcutaneous tunneling of epidural catheter in four easy steps – A novel technique. Saudi J Anaesth 2022;16:514-6

How to cite this URL:
Khan F, Delvi MB, Karadka VS. Subcutaneous tunneling of epidural catheter in four easy steps – A novel technique. Saudi J Anaesth [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Sep 29];16:514-6. Available from: https://www.saudija.org/text.asp?2022/16/4/514/355510



Sir,

Epidural catheter insertion is used routinely in anesthesia practice for various thoracic, abdominal, pelvic, and lower limb surgeries or procedures. The epidural catheter has been found to be a safe and reliable technique for postoperative analgesia even in the pediatric population.[1]

There are several techniques of catheter fixation which help in the prevention of migration of epidural catheter such as looping the epidural catheter, Lockit® Plus catheter securement device (Smith Medical, Massachusetts, USA), and subcutaneous tunneling.[2] Tunneling of epidural catheters has been found to significantly reduce the incidence and extent of catheter dislocation and the chances of bacterial contamination.[3],[4] Though there is clear evidence of the advantages of tunneling an epidural catheter, the technique is still not widely practiced by anesthetists. Several techniques for tunneling epidural catheters using guide wires have been described more recently.[5],[6] However, it can make the procedure more complex. We have described a tunneling technique that can be applied for thoracic and lumbar epidurals in adult patients, and it can be done in four easy steps.

The Technique

Step 1- Inject lidocaine along the path of tunneling and insert a 14 G cannula subcutaneously from the site of catheter insertion to about 3–4 cm away [Figure 1]a.
Figure 1: Photographs showing the technique of tunneling an epidural catheter using 14 G cannula. (a) After siting the epidural catheter, 14 g cannula is inserted subcutaneously from the site of catheter insertion to about 3-4 cm away. (b) The stylet is removed and the Touhy needle is inserted from the opposite end of the 14 G cannula. (c) The cannula is removed leaving the Touhy needle in place. (d) The epidural catheter is now passed through the Touhy needle after ensuring the adequate length of the catheter is in the epidural space by checking the marking on the catheter at the skin level

Click here to view


Step 2- Remove the stylet and pass epidural Tuohy needle from the opposite end through the 14 G cannula [Figure 1]b.

Step 3- Remove the cannula and leave the Tuohy needle in place [Figure 1]c.

Step 4- Pass the epidural catheter through the Tuohy needle [Figure 1]d.

Withdraw the catheter to allow correct length of the catheter in the epidural space, by checking the markings on the catheter at the skin level. Pull the needle out of the skin [Figure 2]a. Both the exit points should be covered with a bio-occlusive dressing [Figure 2]b and [Figure 2]c.
Figure 2: Photographs showing the technique of fixation of catheter. (a) Touhy needle is now withdrawn completely. (b) Both the entry and exit point is covered. (c) The catheter is further secured using bio occlusive dressing

Click here to view


In order to minimize the risk of catheter damage during the introduction of the 14 G cannula, it is important to place a finger on the catheter so as not to shear it with the cannula stylet. The 14 G cannula should be introduced from the same skin puncture site as the exit of the epidural catheter in order to prevent a skin bridge under the catheter, which can lead to improper tunneling. Care should be taken while introducing the catheter through the Tuohy needle as it can shear the catheter. Catheter shearing at this step was not encountered in any of our cases. After placing the catheter at the desired length, the clinician should be cautious while removing the Tuohy needle and ensure that the catheter does not migrate outwards by holding on to the loop of the epidural catheter.

The advantages of this technique over earlier described techniques are that it is easy to learn and perform, the equipment required to perform the procedure is readily available, less chance of catheter shearing compared to the older techniques. It also avoids the formation of skin bridge which leads to ineffective tunneling, which in turn can increase the chance of catheter- related infections.

So far, we have performed this tunneling technique on 20 patients for both thoracic and lumbar epidurals with success. The catheter was left in place for the duration of 3–5 days in all of the patients. Catheter dislodgement or inward migration, kinking, or catheter shearing was not reported in any of the patients. All the patients had adequate postoperative analgesia and an average numeric rating scale (NRS) score of less than 3.

Overall, we have found this technique to be superior to the traditional tunneling techniques in terms of ease of performance and rate of successful tunneling without catheter shear.

Consent for patient images

Not applicable.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Kasanavesi R, Gazula S, Pula R, Thakur N. Safety of post-operative epidural analgesia in the paediatric population: A retrospective analysis. Indian J Anaesth 2015;59:636-40.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
2.
Sharma A, Parasa S, Tejvath K, Ramachandran G. Epidural catheter fixation. A comparison of subcutaneous tunneling versus device fixation technique. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2016;32:65-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
3.
Sellmann T, Bierfischer V, Schmitz A, Weiss M, Rabenalt S, MacKenzie C, et al. Tunneling and suture of thoracic epidural catheters decrease the incidence of catheter dislodgement. ScientificWorldJournal 2014;2014:610635.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Bomberg H, Kubulus C, Herberger S, Wagenpfeil S, Kessler P, Steinfeldt T, et al. Tunnelling of thoracic epidural catheters is associated with fewer catheter-related infections: A retrospective registry analysis. Br J Anaesth 2016;116:546-53.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Maguire D, Thorleifson M. Regional anesthesia catheter tunnelling: A simpler approach. Can J Anesth 2019;67:768-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Lin C, Reece-Nguyen T, Tsui B. A retrograde tunnelling technique for regional anesthesia catheters: how to avoid the skin bridge. Can J Anesth 2019;67:489-90.  Back to cited text no. 6
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
 
Previous article    Next article
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  IN THIS Article
   References
   Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed156    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded43    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal