LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2017 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 505-506
Pulsed radiofrequency of the supraorbital nerve for the treatment of supraorbital neuralgia
Harsh Sachdeva1, Lance Hoffman1, Alaa Abd-Elsyed2
1 Department of Anesthesiology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
2 Department of Anesthesiology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, B6/319 CSC, 600 Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53792-3272
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
|Date of Web Publication||22-Sep-2017|
|How to cite this article:|
Sachdeva H, Hoffman L, Abd-Elsyed A. Pulsed radiofrequency of the supraorbital nerve for the treatment of supraorbital neuralgia. Saudi J Anaesth 2017;11:505-6
|How to cite this URL:|
Sachdeva H, Hoffman L, Abd-Elsyed A. Pulsed radiofrequency of the supraorbital nerve for the treatment of supraorbital neuralgia. Saudi J Anaesth [serial online] 2017 [cited 2021 Sep 23];11:505-6. Available from: https://www.saudija.org/text.asp?2017/11/4/505/206832
Supraorbital neuralgia is an uncommon disorder characterized by unilateral pain involving the supraorbital region and forehead in the distribution of the supraorbital nerve. Although supraorbital neuralgia is a rare disorder, it is the most common extracranial neuralgia among the terminal branches of the trigeminal nerve. Pain is typically described as continuous or intermittent with or without short episodes of sharp exacerbations. According to the International Headache Society, supraorbital neuralgia can be diagnosed by the presence of the following three criteria: (1) pain in the distribution of the supraorbital nerve, (2) tenderness to palpation of the nerve, and (3) temporary resolution of pain with supraorbital nerve block.
The diagnosis of supraorbital neuralgia can be difficult to make, due in large part to the rarity of this disease. The treatment of supraorbital neuralgia poses a challenge due to its refractoriness to conservative management. Pharmacological management with medications such as indomethacin or carbamazepine tends to be ineffective or minimally effective. Interestingly, the refractory nature of this condition to pharmacological therapy can help distinguish supraorbital neuralgia from other diagnoses in the differential. In particular, hemicrania continua can be ruled out due to its high degree of responsiveness to indomethacin. Other diagnoses to consider include ocular pathology, sinusitis, and malignancy.
We are reporting a 21-year-old woman who presented to our clinic for the treatment of chronic headaches. The patient had been experiencing these headaches since she was a teenager. On initial presentation, she rated her pain as 8–9/10 on visual analog scale (VAS). Her headaches were unilateral, started in the right supraorbital region of her forehead, and radiated to her posterior neck. Pain was associated with nausea and vomiting. There was tenderness to palpation over the supraorbital notch on examination. The patient failed medication management.
We performed a diagnostic and therapeutic right supraorbital nerve block, which resulted in 50% relief of pain lasting approximately 3 weeks. Various options along with their risks and benefits were discussed with the patient for ongoing treatment. The patient elected to proceed with pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) of the right supraorbital nerve.
After obtaining written informed consent, the right supraorbital ridge was palpated, and the area prepped with antiseptic solution. A 22-gauge 1.5-inch insulated needle with 5 mm active tip was inserted along the groove and advanced perpendicular until the needle approached the periosteum of the underlying bone. Another 22-gauge 1.5-inch insulated needle with 5 mm active tip was placed next to the first needle. Following placement of the needle, sensory stimulation at 50 Hz was used to confirm reproduction of pain in the area of symptoms. PRF was carried out in pulsed lesion mode after injecting 1 ml of 2% lidocaine. The settings were 45°C and 180 s.
At follow-up, the patient described a 50% reduction in pain. She rated her pain as 4/10 on VAS. In addition, she described her pain as primarily being in her right lateral neck and posterior head with resolution of pain in her forehead. The patient described ongoing relief for more than 6 months following the procedure. The patient received one additional right supraorbital PRF treatment with ongoing relief to date.
The use of PRF and radiofrequency ablation in treating peripheral neuralgias is not well studied. Our case suggests that PRF can be safe and effective in treating supraorbital neuralgia. Larger trials are needed to prove the consistency and success of this procedure in treating peripheral neuralgias in general.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
Dr. Abd-Elsayed is a consultant for Innocoll, Axsome, Medtronic, Halyard, SpineLoop and Ultimaxx health.
| References|| |
Pareja JA, Caminero AB. Supraorbital neuralgia. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2006;10:302-5.
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias, and facial pain: 2nd
edition. Cephalalgia 2004;24 Suppl 1:9-160.
Sjaastad O, Stolt-Nielsen A, Pareja JA, Fredriksen TA, Vincent M. Supraorbital neuralgia. On the clinical manifestations and a possible therapeutic approach. Headache 1999;39:204-12.
| Article Access Statistics|
| Viewed||1986 |
| Printed||22 |
| Emailed||0 |
| PDF Downloaded||69 |
| Comments ||[Add] |