Previous article Table of Contents  Next article

LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 127-128

Concerns about use of WhatsApp for sharing preanesthesia evaluation form among anesthesiologists


Department of Anaesthesia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Correspondence Address:
Anjana S Wajekar
Shri Niwas, Plot No. 62/7, Sector 28, Vashi, Navi Mumbai - 400 703, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1658-354X.197362

Rights and Permissions
Date of Web Publication2-Jan-2017
 


How to cite this article:
Wajekar AS. Concerns about use of WhatsApp for sharing preanesthesia evaluation form among anesthesiologists. Saudi J Anaesth 2017;11:127-8

How to cite this URL:
Wajekar AS. Concerns about use of WhatsApp for sharing preanesthesia evaluation form among anesthesiologists. Saudi J Anaesth [serial online] 2017 [cited 2021 Mar 5];11:127-8. Available from: https://www.saudija.org/text.asp?2017/11/1/127/197362



Sir,

First and foremost, I applaud the team on this novel use of WhatsApp for sharing preanesthesia evaluation form among anesthesiologists.

[1] In many institutes, it is a common practice where the preanesthesia checkup (PAC) is conducted in the preoperative assessment clinics, where the anesthesiologists are usually posted by rotation. In this scenario, it is quite common that the anesthesiologist clearing the patient for surgery and the anesthesiologist anesthetizing the patient may be different as pointed out by the authors. Some of the points that I wish to point out with regard to this are as follows:

  1. Many government and corporate hospitals, catering to various surgical disciplines, have large anesthesia department. The surgical patient load in these hospitals may also be large. Some of the patients may have similar sounding names. In this scenario, there may be confusion if all the PACs are put up in the same group in WhatsApp. What I suggest, if I may, is that smaller groups be made on WhatsApp according to the different surgical disciplines and these PACs may be forwarded accordingly. Furthermore, it cannot replace the final evaluation of the patient just before anesthetizing the patient [2]
  2. The patients who may be seen and cleared in the preoperative assessment clinics may also not come up for surgery immediately. Generally, an anesthesia visit 1 day before surgery is advisable even if the patient has been examined previously. This helps us to evaluate any new symptom or sign as also take the opportunity to allay patient anxiety. Forwarding the PACs from this preoperative visit may serve better than from when the patient has been cleared previously
  3. One last concern that comes to mind is the maintenance of confidentiality and patient privacy. Generally, the PACs and perioperative records are scanned and kept in the medical records section or hospital data management systems. However, forwarding these on WhatsApp may breach the right to confidentiality accorded to the patient and may make the anesthesiologist liable to litigation.[3]


Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Nair A, Mudunuri R, Kulkarni V. Use of WhatsAPP for sharing preanaesthesia evaluation form among anesthesiologists. Saudi J Anaesth 2016;10:480-1.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.
Burk N, Mazzei W. The need for an anesthesia preoperative evaluation centre. Anesth Analg 1990;70:S44.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Blightman K, Griffiths SE, Danbury C. Patient confidentiality: When can a breach be justified? Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain 2014;14:52-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
    




 

Top
 
Previous article    Next article
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  IN THIS Article
   References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1584    
    Printed10    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded102    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal