|
Previous article 
Next article |
|
|
ERRATUM
Year : 2015 | Volume
: 9
| Issue : 2 | Page : 235
0.5% levobupivacaine versus 0.5% ropivacaine: Are they different in ultrasound-guided sciatic block?: Erratum
Correspondence Address:
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/1658-354X.152905
| Date of Web Publication | 10-Mar-2015 |
|
|
How to cite this article:
. 0.5% levobupivacaine versus 0.5% ropivacaine: Are they different in ultrasound-guided sciatic block?: Erratum. Saudi J Anaesth 2015;9:235 |
How to cite this URL:
. 0.5% levobupivacaine versus 0.5% ropivacaine: Are they different in ultrasound-guided sciatic block?: Erratum. Saudi J Anaesth [serial online] 2015 [cited 2021 Sep 24];9:235. Available from: https://www.saudija.org/text.asp?2015/9/2/235/152905 |
In the article that appeared on page 3-8 of the Saudi Journal of Anesthesia, Vol. 9, No. 1, January-March, 2015 issue [1] there was an error in authors' first and last name. The author names should be as follows:
Pham Dang Charles, Langlois Cécile, Lambert Chantal, Nguyen Jean-Michel, Asehnoune Karim, Lejus Corinne
Accordingly the citation should be as follows:
Pham Dang C, Langlois C, Lambert C, Nguyen JM, Asehnoune K, Lejus C
Abdelazeem EL-Dawlatly
Editor In Chief
| References | |  |
| 1. | Charles PD, Cécile L, Chantal L, Jean-Michel N, Karim A, Corinne L. 0.5% levobupivacaine versus 0.5% ropivacaine: Are they different in ultrasound-guided sciatic block?. Saudi J Anaesth 2015;9:3-8.  |
|
