Previous article Table of Contents  Next article

CASE REPORT
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 191-193

Successful retrieval of a knotted pulmonary artery catheter trapped in the tricuspid valve apparatus


1 Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery & Anaesthesia, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
2 Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Correspondence Address:
Muhammad Ishaq
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Anaesthesia, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
United Kingdom
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1658-354X.114048

Rights and Permissions
Date of Web Publication26-Jun-2013
 

  Abstract 

We report the case of a 64-year-old patient in whom a pulmonary artery catheter formed a knot fixed within the right ventricle in the region of the tricuspid valve apparatus. Knot formation is a recognized complication associated with pulmonary artery catheters (PAC) insertion. This problem is usually dealt with by simply withdrawing the PAC until the knot impacts onto the introducer and after enlarging the puncture site by a small skin incision removing the introducer-PAC as one unit. However, we recently encountered a situation where the PAC was knotted around the tricuspid valve apparatus and could not be withdrawn. An interventional radiologist was able to unknot the catheter and release it from the tricuspid valve. We reviewed the literature related to this topic. We believe our experience could be of use to others.

Keywords: Invasive hemodynamic monitoring, pulmonary artery catheter, pulmonary artery catheter complications, tricuspid valve


How to cite this article:
Ishaq M, Alexander N, Scott DH. Successful retrieval of a knotted pulmonary artery catheter trapped in the tricuspid valve apparatus. Saudi J Anaesth 2013;7:191-3

How to cite this URL:
Ishaq M, Alexander N, Scott DH. Successful retrieval of a knotted pulmonary artery catheter trapped in the tricuspid valve apparatus. Saudi J Anaesth [serial online] 2013 [cited 2020 Oct 30];7:191-3. Available from: https://www.saudija.org/text.asp?2013/7/2/191/114048


  Introduction Top


We had a patient in the operation theatre for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) was inserted, during the insertion process the pulmonary artery catheter formed a knot and was trapped in the tricuspid valve apparatus. Knot formation of PAC is one of the several complications encountered during this procedure. In our patients the pulmonary artery catheter was successfully and non-surgically released from the attachment and extracted by an interventional radiologist under the fluoroscopy.


  Case Report Top


A 64-year-old man with a 20-month history of exertional chest pain presented for elective myocardial revascularization. Past medical history included hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and hypercholesterolemia. The patient underwent coronary angiogram, which revealed extensive diffuse 3 vessel disease and very poor left ventricular function with an ejection fraction of about 25%. Trans-thoracic echo showed dilated left ventricle with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Recent MRI showed extensive regional wall motion abnormalities, but no late gadolinium enhancement despite wall thinning, suggestive of viable and hibernating myocardium. Preoperative vital signs, physical examination, electrocardiogram, chest X-ray results, and laboratory values were consistent with the patient's underlying conditions and revealed no acute changes in his condition.

Invasive monitoring was inserted in the anesthetic room. This consisted of a brachial arterial line, a right internal jugular central venous catheter, and a sheath for a PAC. A PAC was passed into the pulmonary artery. Attempts to wedge the PAC were unsuccessful and when we tried to withdraw the PAC we found that it was tethered. A transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) confirmed that the PAC was tangled in the tricuspid valve apparatus [Figure 1]. TOE of the knotted PAC in the tricuspid valve apparatus.
Figure 1: TOE of the knotted pulmonary artery catheter in tricuspid valve apparatus

Click here to view


The help of an interventional radiologist was sought. Under fluoroscopy the PAC was wired and using traction over the wire the knot was worked along to the end of the catheter and released. This allowed the PAC to be re-floated with a satisfactory pulmonary wedge pressure in the right pulmonary artery. The patient's postoperative course was entirely uneventful. He made good progress in the ward and was discharged home [Figure 2]a and b. X-ray of the knotted PACs.
Figure 2: (a) X-ray chest arrow shows knot of the pulmonary artery catheter in RV. (b) X-ray of the knotted pulmonary artery catheter arrow shows the distal end of the catheter securely snared at the balloon site and withdrawing the knotted portion of the pulmonary artery catheter through the jugular vein

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Pulmonary artery catheter (PACs) provide invasive monitoring of several hemodynamic parameters that often cannot be predicted accurately from standard clinical signs and symptoms of patients. Information obtained can be used to supplement or even correct clinical observations; however, the use of PACs remains controversial due to complications associated with them.

Indications for using PACs in cardiac and noncardiac surgical patients include severe left ventricular dysfunction, severe pulmonary hypertension, septic shock, cardiogenic shock, pulmonary edema, and severe toxaemia of pregnancy. [1] Complications associated with pulmonary artery catheterization (PACs) are divided into the following categories:

  1. Venous access complications, including unintentional puncture of nearby arteries such the carotid or subclavian artery, bleeding, pneumothorax, nerve lesions, and air embolism. [2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7] The use of ultrasound for insertion of the sheath has been shown to reduce all these complications. [8]
  2. Pulmonary artery catheterization causes dysrhythmias such as premature ventricular and atrial beats in 70% of the cases. These usually resolve spontaneously after the catheter is advanced or withdrawn through the right ventricle. Ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation occurs in 0.3% of the cases. Catheter introduction can produce right bundle-branch block and, in patients with previous left bundle-branch block, can induce a complete heart block.
  3. Complications associated with catheter residence inside the body including venous thrombosis thrombophlebitis, pulmonary embolism and infarction, cardiac mural thrombi, valvular injury, infection, and pulmonary artery rupture. Sepsis is a complication of PAC residence.
  4. Those associated with misuse of equipment and misinterpretation of data.
Many complications related to PACs have been reported over the past decades. Their incidence is not clearly known as they are described either as an isolated case report or as a small case series.

All intravascular devices are at risk for knots, but PACs appear to be the most susceptible to knotting as described in our case report. Entrapment of PACs to intracardiac structures most often occurs in the right atrium. [1] PACS can be sutured into intracardiac structures during purstring suture for inserting bi-caval cannula for establishment of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). [1] The knot or looping formation occurs during an attempt to direct the catheter to pulmonary wedge position in back-and-forth manipulation maneuvers. These problems are more likely when the PAC is inserted to an excessive distance, leading to looping or coiling of the catheter within the cardiac chambers. In such an event, the catheter should be carefully withdrawn to the 30 cm mark and re-advanced, avoiding careless maneuvers. Knots or kinks in the catheter should be suspected if there is any difficulty in withdrawing a PAC, and the diagnosis may be confirmed by TOE or chest radiography. Another recommendation is to inflate the PAC balloon partially when it is located in the vena cava. Only after it reaches the right ventricle should it be completely inflated. This maneuver can facilitate the progression of the PAC tip to the pulmonary artery without producing cardiac valve lesions and can also reduce the possibility of PAC looping. The literature reviewed suggests a variety of techniques for managing fixed or knotted intravascular catheters, but all have associated risk. [9] There are surgical and nonsurgical techniques for solving this problem. In general surgery cases, one option is to reduce the knot's diameter by introducing another sheath to tie the knot more firmly, pull it back to the skin, and then surgically remove it. [10] Other techniques are simple traction, extraction using a large sheath or guide wires, cut-down techniques, removal via snare under fluoroscopy, and open surgery. [10] In cardiac surgery, a knotted intracardiac catheter can be removed via cardiotomy. [11] In our case, the patient had very poor left ventricular function and was undergoing off-pump coronary myocardial revascularization. Interventional radiological techniques, such as the one used in our case, have for the most part replaced open surgical techniques. The best and the least invasive option is the use of a 0.038-inch movable core-guided wire through the lumen of the catheter to untie the knot under fluoroscopic control. [10] Fluoroscopic control is necessary because of the theoretical hazard of perforating the catheter, blood vessels, or cardiac chambers. If the knot is not too tight, this technique should not introduce an extra hazard to the patient. [10]

In summary, the literature reveals that PACs provide useful hemodynamic information for the management of patients. However, one should always bear in mind the risk of complications. Prior to termination of CPB, the PACs ought to be pulled gently 5-10 cm to ensure that it is free. Angulation of the catheter is an important diagnostic sign. [1]

 
  References Top

1.Alsatli R. Pulmonary artery catheter entrapment in cardiac surgery. Saudi J Anaesth 2010;4:114-6.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.Puri VK, Carlson RW, Bander JJ, Weil MH. Complications of vascular catheterization in the critically ill. A prospective study. Crit Care Med 1980;8:495-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Mansfield PF, Hohn DC, Fornage BD, Gregurich MA, Ota DM. Complications and failures of subclavian-vein catheterization. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1735-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Schwartz AJ, Jobes DR, Greenhow DE, Stephenson LW, Ellison N. Carotid artery puncture with jugular cannulation using the Seldinger technique: Incidence, recognition, treatment and prevention. Anaesthesiol 1979;51:S160.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Elliott CG, Zimmerman GA, Clemmer TP. Complications of pulmonary artery catheterization in the care of critically ill patients. A prospective study. Chest 1979;76:647-52.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Sise MJ, Hollingsworth P, Brimm JE, Peters RM, Virgilio RW, Shackford SR. Complications of the flow-directed pulmonary artery catheter: A prospective analysis in 219 patients. Crit Care Med 1981;9:315-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Boyd KD, Thomas SJ, Gold J, Boyd AD. A prospective study of complications of pulmonary artery catheterizations in 500 consecutive patients. Chest 1983;84:245-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Scott DH. The king of the blind extends his frontiers. Br J Anaesth 2004;93:175-78.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Eshkevari L, Baker BM. Occurrence and removal of a knotted pulmonary artery catheter a case report. AANA J 2007;75:423-8.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Lopes MC, de Cleva R, Zilberstein B, Gama-Rodrigues JJ. Pulmonary artery catheter complications: Report on a case of a knot accident and literature review. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo 2004;59:77-85.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Kaltenborn HA, Klose KJ. Methodologic procedure in the removal of a knotted intravascular pulmonary artery catheter. Rontgenblatter 1990;43:27-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
 
Previous article    Next article
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  IN THIS Article
   Abstract
  Introduction
  Case Report
  Discussion
   References
   Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1701    
    Printed47    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded90    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal