Previous articleTable of Contents Next article

Year : 2010  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 46

Personalized intravenous regional anesthesia

Associate Professor of Clinical Anesthesiology, Columbia University, New York, USA

Correspondence Address:
Pamela Flood
Associate Professor of Clinical Anesthesiology, Columbia University, New York
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/1658-354X.65117

Rights and Permissions
Date of Web Publication6-Jul-2010

How to cite this article:
Flood P. Personalized intravenous regional anesthesia. Saudi J Anaesth 2010;4:46

How to cite this URL:
Flood P. Personalized intravenous regional anesthesia. Saudi J Anaesth [serial online] 2010 [cited 2023 Feb 1];4:46. Available from:

Intravenous regional anesthesia is simple, low risk anesthetic for surgery of distal extremity. Drawbacks to its use include tourniquet pain, slow onset of action and rapid resolution of postoperative analgesia. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and clonidine have previously been shown to improve postoperative analgesia and clonidine improves tourniquet pain. [1] In this issue of Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia, Elmetwaly and coauthors have added two additional effective adjuvant drugs to our armamentarium for intravenous regional anesthesia. [2]

In a randomized, double blind study of 75 patients having hand surgery, 25 received lidocaine supplemented with ketamine 0.1 mg/kg, another 25 received lidocaine supplemented with 200 g nitroglycerine and the other 25 received lidocaine alone. Both the adjuvant treatments were associated with more rapid onset of sensory and motor block after initiation of anesthesia and slower resolution. Less tourniquet pain was reported by patients who received adjuvant treatment with a larger effect size in the ketamine group. Both the treatments reduced postoperative pain.

Metabolism of nitroglycerine to NO within the vasculature causes vasodilation within the blocked area which would be expected to speed the onset of the block. Intrathecal NO donors are thought to reduce central sensitization and treatment with systemic nitroglycerine has been shown to prolong the effect of intrathecal sufentanil and may act synergistically with intrathecal neostigmine. However, since nitroglycerine is evanescent in the vasculature, the mechanism by which it would reduce postoperative pain after 45 minutes of metabolism within the vasculature during surgery is less clear. There is no known peripheral affect.

The effect of ketamine on postoperative pain is easier to understand. Ketamine is a well-known analgesic drug that acts at least in part as an N-methyl-D-aspartate acid (NMDA) antagonist. Ketamine may enhance intra-operative conditions including tourniquet pain by blocking NMDA receptors expressed on peripheral c-fibers in the forearm. It is metabolized in the liver by N-demethylation to nor-ketamine; so, it would be expected to be released from the arm unchanged after deflation of the tourniquet. A significant postoperative pain effect from ketamine 0.1 mg/kg is not surprising.

Regardless of the mechanism of action, practitioners of intravenous regional anesthesia now have four reasonable adjuvant agents from which to choose. Individual patient characteristics should guide the choice of adjuvant drug. Patients with poor peripheral vasculature may particularly benefit from the vasodilatory action of nitroglycerine added to the local anesthetic for peripheral regional anesthesia. Patients with severe ongoing pain or opioid tolerance would be expected to have additional benefit from adjuvant clonidine or ketamine as these drugs are known to be efficacious in these conditions. Non-steroidal analgesics are efficacious as adjuvant analgesics in many postoperative settings but care should be taken when bone healing and renal perfusion are an issue.

In summary, Elmetwaly et al. have described two potentially useful adjuvant drugs for intravenous regional anesthesia. A clear delineation of which drug is best for which class of patient will have to wait for future clinical trials but the availability of additional options is undoubtedly better.

  References Top

1.Choyce A, Peng P. A systematic review of adjuncts for intravenous regional anesthesia for surgical procedures. Can J Anaesth 2002;49:32-45.  Back to cited text no. 1  [PUBMED]    
2.Elmetwaly KF, Hegazy NA, Aboelseoud AA, Alshaer AA. Does the use of ketamine or nitroglycerin as an adjuvant to lidocaine improve the quality of intravenous regional anesthesia? Saudi J Anaesth 2010;4:55-62.  Back to cited text no. 2    Medknow Journal  

This article has been cited by
1 Efficacy of Ketamine as an Adjunct to Lidocaine in Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
Hala S. Abdel-Ghaffar,Mahmoud Abdel-Azez Kalefa,Ahmed Said Imbaby
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2014; 39(5): 418
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


Previous article Next article
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  IN THIS Article

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded339    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal