Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2019  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 290--294

Comparative study of fiber-optic guided tracheal intubation through intubating laryngeal mask airway LMA Fastrach™ and i-gel in adult paralyzed patients


Suvidha Sood, Anupriya Saxena, Anil Thakur, Shikha Chahar 
 Department of Anaesthesiology, ESI-PGIMSR, Basaidarapur, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Anupriya Saxena
C1G Mayur Vihar Phase 1, New Delhi - 110 091
India

Background: The i-gel is a novel and innovative supraglottic airway management device used both as an airway rescue device and as a conduit for fiberoptic intubation. In this prospective randomized study, we compared fiberoptic-guided tracheal intubation through the i-gel and LMA Fastrach™ in adult paralyzed patients. Materials and Methods: After ethical committee approval and written informed consent, 60 patients of either sex were randomly allocated to either group of supraglottic airway device (SGAD). After successful insertion of the SGAD, the fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB)-guided tracheal intubation was done through the respective SGAD. The primary objectives were the ease and time taken for fiberoptic-guided intubation in either group. Secondary variables included time taken for successful placement of SGAD, ease of insertion of SGAD, airway seal pressure, ease and time of removal of SGAD, variation in hemodynamic parameters, and complications if any. Results: Time taken for tracheal intubation in LMA Fastrach™ group was 69.53 ± 5.09 s and for the i-gel group it was 72.33 ± 6.73 s. It was seen that it was easy to insert the endotracheal tube (ETT) in 93.3% patients in the LMA Fastrach™ group and 96.7% patients in the i-gel group. Airway seal pressure was higher for the LMA Fastrach™ group. Both the SGADs were comparable in the number of attempts of insertion, ease of insertion, and insertion time. In addition, the hemodynamic variables noted did not show any increase after insertion of SGAD. There was no difficulty encountered in removal of either SGAD. Conclusion: I-gel may be a reliable and cost-effective alternative to LMA Fastrach™ for fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation.


How to cite this article:
Sood S, Saxena A, Thakur A, Chahar S. Comparative study of fiber-optic guided tracheal intubation through intubating laryngeal mask airway LMA Fastrach™ and i-gel in adult paralyzed patients.Saudi J Anaesth 2019;13:290-294


How to cite this URL:
Sood S, Saxena A, Thakur A, Chahar S. Comparative study of fiber-optic guided tracheal intubation through intubating laryngeal mask airway LMA Fastrach™ and i-gel in adult paralyzed patients. Saudi J Anaesth [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 15 ];13:290-294
Available from: http://www.saudija.org/article.asp?issn=1658-354X;year=2019;volume=13;issue=4;spage=290;epage=294;aulast=Sood;type=0