Previous article Table of Contents  Next article

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 178-182

Assessment of medical practitioners' knowledge of fibromyalgia in Saudi Arabia


1 Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
2 Department of Anesthesia, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Correspondence Address:
Prof. Abdullah Mohammad Kaki
Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, P.O. Box 2907, Jeddah 21461
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/sja.SJA_458_17

Rights and Permissions
Date of Web Publication9-Mar-2018
 

  Abstract 


Background: Fibromyalgia (FM), a relatively common disease, is difficult to diagnose owing to its subjective symptoms and poor knowledge among medical practitioners. The purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge regarding FM among medical practitioners in Saudi Arabia and the need for educational programs at the undergraduate level.
Subjects and Methods: An online survey was administered to physicians, nurses, and technologist/technicians in different regions of the country. Responses were obtained from 104 medical practitioners. Knowledge regarding FM including clinical symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment was assessed.
Results: Only 26% of the respondents reported that FM was part of their undergraduate curriculum, and only 8.7% attended educational programs about FM. (Approximately 50% of the medical practitioners either referred FM patients to unrelated specialty or did not know whom to refer these patients to). Only 33.7% of the respondents were familiar with the diagnostic criteria. Physiotherapy (69.4%) and pharmacological treatment (63.9%) were predominantly reported as the appropriate treatment.
Conclusions: Knowledge regarding FM among medical practitioners in Saudi Arabia is poor. Further education at the undergraduate level is needed to improve knowledge and avoid delays in diagnosis and treatment.

Keywords: Fibromyalgia; knowledge; medical practitioners; pain management; rheumatological disease


How to cite this article:
Kaki AM, Hazazi AA. Assessment of medical practitioners' knowledge of fibromyalgia in Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Anaesth 2018;12:178-82

How to cite this URL:
Kaki AM, Hazazi AA. Assessment of medical practitioners' knowledge of fibromyalgia in Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Anaesth [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Aug 17];12:178-82. Available from: http://www.saudija.org/text.asp?2018/12/2/178/226988




  Introduction Top


Fibromyalgia (FM) is defined by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1990 classification as widespread pain affecting both sides of the body in the upper and lower segments along with tenderness in at least 11 of 18 specific tender sites.[1] In 2010, the ACR published preliminary revised criteria to diagnose FM that does not include tender points but severity of fatigue, waking unrefreshed, and cognitive symptoms as part of the core diagnostic assessment. The diagnosis for FM according to ACR 2016 revision should fulfil: (1) generalized pain (at least 4 of 5 regions); (2) persistent symptoms for at least 3 months; (3) widespread pain index (WPI ≥7) and Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) score ≥5 or WPI 4–6 and SSS score ≥9; and (4) a diagnosis of FM is valid irrespective of other diagnoses.[2],[3]

The prevalence of FM in Saudi Arabia is unknown. Globally, the prevalence ranges 0.5%–5%, affecting more women than men. An estimated 6–10 million people in the United States have FM.[4],[5],[6],[7] There is no known cause of FM and the pathophysiology is uncertain.[8] However, central sensitization as well as genetic and environmental causes have been explored.[9],[10],[11]

Treatment for FM should be multidisciplinary and involve pharmacological and nonpharmacological measures. The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge regarding FM among medical practitioners in Saudi Arabia.


  Subjects and Methods Top


Following approval from the Ethics Committee in King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, an epidemiological study was conducted to assess medical practitioners' knowledge regarding FM in Saudi Arabia. An online survey was sent to different medical practitioners (physicians, nurses, and technologist/technicians) in different cities in the country. A total of 104 anonymous responses were received. The survey consisted of 23 questions that obtained information regarding demographics, professional background, and opinions of the old criteria (ACR 1990) for diagnosis and treatment of FM. In addition, we asked the participants whether they attended any activities or lectures about FM recently or during their undergraduate training. Acceptance to complete the survey indicated informed consent.

The demographic information included sex, age, region of the country, specialty, position, and graduation year and country. The survey was designed to assess 4 areas of the medical practitioner's knowledge: (1) Attendance at Continuing Medical Education/awareness campaigns or lectures regarding FM during undergraduate training (questions 10, 11, and 12); (2) knowledge of FM (questions 13, 14, 17, and 18); (3) diagnosis (questions 15, 16, and 19); and (4) treatment (questions 21, 22, and 23) [Appendix 1] [Additional file 1]. The data collected through the online survey were downloaded and analyzed using Microsoft Excel.


  Results Top


A total of 104 medical practitioners (73 physicians, 13 nurses, 3 pharmacists, 8 technologists/technicians, and 7 others) completed the survey. Of the 73 physicians, 28 were consultants, 31 specialists, 13 residents, and 2 medical students/interns. [Table 1] shows the demographic background of the participants. The average age was approximately 35 years (range 22–60 years). The average years of practice were 10.6 years after graduation. Most of the participants graduated from the same country (78.8%), and most of the participants were male (n = 79; 76%).
Table 1: Demographic characteristics of the medical practitioners

Click here to view


More than half of the respondents (68.3%) claimed that they heard about FM, but only 8.7% had attended educational programs regarding FM and only 26% attended lectures regarding FM during undergraduate training. There was no big difference in terms of education for FM between those who studied inside (8.5%) or outside (9.1%) Saudi Arabia. However, a higher proportion of respondents who studied in Saudi Arabia (29.3%) than those who studied outside (13.6%) had FM as part of their curriculum during undergraduate training. A higher number of physicians (11.9%) than nonphysicians (2.7%) attended educational programs. Similarly, a higher number of physicians (32.8%) than nonphysicians (13.4%) attended FM-related lectures during their undergraduate training.

The responses to the question regarding referrals were as follows: Rheumatologist, 28.8%; pain physicians, 22.1%; don't know, 20.1%; and neurologist, 18.2%. This might explain why a high percentage of FM patients are usually seen by rheumatologists and pain physicians. More than two-thirds of the respondents (71.2%) reported not encountering any cases of FM, and 66.7% stated that they saw 1–20 FM patients in the last year.

Only 33.7% of respondents stated that they were familiar with the 1990 ACR classification criteria for FM.[1] However, when asked about the number of tender points out of 18 required to diagnose FM, only 37.1% answered correctly, and only 47.1% knew that the diagnosis is established clinically. Less than half of the respondents (46.2%) knew that FM more commonly affects women. [Figure 1] summarizes the respondents' responses to items regarding symptoms of FM. Fatigue (60.6%) and widespread pain (52%) were the most commonly recognized symptoms by medical practitioners, followed by sleep problems, anxiety, and headache. Finally, physiotherapy (69.4%) was predominantly selected as the appropriate treatment approach, followed by pharmacological treatment (63.9%). The most common drugs chosen were amitriptyline (58.3%) and pregabalin (52.8%), followed by duloxetine (33.3%), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (33.3%) [Figure 2].
Figure 1: Common clinical presentation of fibromyalgia

Click here to view
Figure 2: Treatment options for fibromyalgia patients

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


We found that approximately half of the medical practitioners do not know whom they should refer FM patients to because they lack the knowledge since undergraduate training; moreover, only a few of the respondents attended educational programs about FM. Although the medical practitioners who studied in Saudi Arabia attended more lectures at the undergraduate level than those who studied outside Saudi Arabia, their knowledge about FM was poor. This was clear from the answers to the questions about diagnostic criteria and treatment options. Physicians usually facing difficulty in diagnosing and managing FM patients because diagnosis based on subjective symptoms and also because of poor knowledge of medical practitioners about FM from different studies done worldwide.[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20] For that reason, it took usually an average of 2.3 years and visit an average of 3.7 physicians to reach the final diagnosis.[21] The early diagnosis is important to save the cost of unnecessary tests and frequent visits to different specialties in addition to the positive impact on the patients if diagnosis is known.[22],[23] In contrast, many patients with musculoskeletal symptoms have been incorrectly diagnosed as FM.[24]

Based on the responses to questions regarding the 1990 ACR criteria, rheumatologists and pain physicians were more familiar with FM than other medical practitioners. This reflects the greater level of expertise in managing such conditions among rheumatologists and pain physicians. Thus, although FM is considered a rheumatological disease according to the ACR,[1],[2] it is not surprising that FM patients are referred to different specialties. Important limitations to this study include recall bias and the small sample size.


  Conclusions Top


The results emphasize the need to improve physician training modules in terms of the diagnosis of FM, especially family medicine physicians. It is important for all medical practitioners to be familiar with FM to avoid delays in diagnosis. To address this issue, additional educational programs as well as inclusion of information regarding FM at the undergraduate level training is necessary.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB, Bennett RM, Bombardier C, Goldenberg DL, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia. Report of the Multicenter Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:160-72.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, Goldenberg DL, Katz RS, Mease P, et al. The American College of Rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia and measurement of symptom severity. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2010;62:600-10.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, Goldenberg DL, Häuser W, Katz RL, et al. 2016 Revisions to the 2010/2011 fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2016;46:319-29.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Wolfe F, Ross K, Anderson J, Russell IJ, Hebert L. The prevalence and characteristics of fibromyalgia in the general population. Arthritis Rheum 1995;38:19-28.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Lawrence RC, Helmick CG, Arnett FC, Deyo RA, Felson DT, Giannini EH, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorders in the United States. Arthritis Rheum 1998;41:778-99.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
White KP, Harth M. Classification, epidemiology, and natural history of fibromyalgia. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2001;5:320-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Neumann L, Buskila D. Epidemiology of fibromyalgia. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2003;7:362-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Clauw DJ. Fibromyalgia: A clinical review. JAMA 2014;311:1547-55.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Buskila D, Sarzi-Puttini P. Biology and therapy of fibromyalgia. Genetic aspects of fibromyalgia syndrome. Arthritis Res Ther 2006;8:218.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Ablin JN, Cohen H, Buskila D. Mechanisms of disease: Genetics of fibromyalgia. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 2006;2:671-8.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Meeus M, Nijs J. Central sensitization: A biopsychosocial explanation for chronic widespread pain in patients with fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome. Clin Rheumatol 2007;26:465-73.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Hayes SM, Myhal GC, Thornton JF, Camerlain M, Jamison C, Cytryn KN, et al. Fibromyalgia and the therapeutic relationship: Where uncertainty meets attitude. Pain Res Manag 2010;15:385-91.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Perrot S, Choy E, Petersel D, Ginovker A, Kramer E. Survey of physician experiences and perceptions about the diagnosis and treatment of fibromyalgia. BMC Health Serv Res 2012;12:356.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Hughes L, Adair J, Feng F, Maciejewski S, Sharma H. Nurse practitioners' education, awareness, and therapeutic approaches for the management of fibromyalgia. Orthop Nurs 2016;35:317-22.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Buskila D, Neumann L, Sibirski D, Shvartzman P. Awareness of diagnostic and clinical features of fibromyalgia among family physicians. Fam Pract 1997;14:238-41.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Bloom S, Ablin JN, Lebel D, Rath E, Faran Y, Daphna-Tekoah S, et al. Awareness of diagnostic and clinical features of fibromyalgia among orthopedic surgeons. Rheumatol Int 2013;33:927-31.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Kianmehr N, Haghighi A, Bidari A, Sharafian Ardekani Y, Karimi MA. Are general practitioners well informed about fibromyalgia? Int J Rheum Dis. 2015 Jul 22. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12716. [Epub ahead of print].  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Acuña Ortiz FE, Capitán de la Cruz VA, León Jiménez FE. Knowledge on fibromyalgia among general practitioners, from chiclayo-peru, 2016. Reumatol Clin 2016. pii: S1699-258X(16)30100-0.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Kamoun S, Elleuch M, Le Lay K, Feki H, Taieb C, André E, et al. Evaluation of knowledge of fibromyalgia in tunisia. Tunis Med 2010;88:703-6.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Blotman F, Thomas E, Myon E, Andre E, Caubere JP, Taïeb C, et al. Awareness and knowledge of fibromyalgia among French rheumatologists and general practitioners. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2005;23:697-700.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Choy E, Perrot S, Leon T, Kaplan J, Petersel D, Ginovker A, et al. A patient survey of the impact of fibromyalgia and the journey to diagnosis. BMC Health Serv Res 2010;10:102.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Spaeth M. Epidemiology, costs, and the economic burden of fibromyalgia. Arthritis Res Ther 2009;11:117.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Hughes G, Martinez C, Myon E, Taïeb C, Wessely S. The impact of a diagnosis of fibromyalgia on health care resource use by primary care patients in the UK: An observational study based on clinical practice. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:177-83.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Fitzcharles MA, Boulos P. Inaccuracy in the diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome: Analysis of referrals. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003;42:263-7.  Back to cited text no. 24
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
Previous article    Next article
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  IN THIS Article
   Abstract
  Introduction
  Subjects and Methods
  Results
  Discussion
  Conclusions
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed542    
    Printed46    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded85    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal