Previous article Table of Contents  Next article

LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 495-496

Avoiding failed spinal anesthesia: “Advik technique”


1 Department of Anaesthesia, Maulana Azad Medical College, Lok Nayak Hospital, Delhi, India
2 Department of CTVS, AIIMS Hospital, New Delhi, India
3 MBBS Student, PGIMS Hospital, Rohtak, Haryana, India

Correspondence Address:
Kamna Kakkar
98, Om Vihar, Phase-IA, Shiv Shankar Road, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi - 110 059
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/sja.SJA_98_17

Rights and Permissions
Date of Web Publication22-Sep-2017
 


How to cite this article:
Kakkar B, Gupta L, Gupta A, Kakkar K. Avoiding failed spinal anesthesia: “Advik technique”. Saudi J Anaesth 2017;11:495-6

How to cite this URL:
Kakkar B, Gupta L, Gupta A, Kakkar K. Avoiding failed spinal anesthesia: “Advik technique”. Saudi J Anaesth [serial online] 2017 [cited 2020 Apr 9];11:495-6. Available from: http://www.saudija.org/text.asp?2017/11/4/495/206850



Sir,

Spinal anesthesia refers to a technique whereby local anesthetics are administered in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the subarachnoid space. Apart from avoiding the complications of general anesthesia, it is a simple, reliable, and quick procedure, but sometimes we come across partial or complete failure of spinal anesthesia, failure rates of 0.72%–16.0% have been reported.[1],[2] After proper positioning, the top of iliac crests is identified. After injecting local anesthesia, spinal needle is inserted; an increased resistance is felt as the needle enters the ligamentum flavum, followed by a loss of resistance as the epidural space is entered. As the needle goes through the dura mater, a “pop” is felt; at this time, stylet should be removed to check for CSF flow that the needle tip is in the correct space.[3] Many times, we are unable to get a point at which CSF flows “freely” in the hub. At this point, after the initial appearance of CSF, rotating the needle clockwise or anticlockwise through 90° has been advocated to know the free flow of CSF, but that method also can fail at times, and some might have to repeat spinal anesthesia in the same patient or convert it into general anesthesia.[4] We deduced “Advik technique,” in which we use “1 ml syringe” which is inserted firmly into the hub of spinal needle to know exactly where the CSF flows best and that is the point where it is desirable to give the drug. We use 1 ml syringe as flow is best assessed in the narrowest syringe whereas in two or five ml syringe (usually used to give drug), flow can sometimes be difficult to assess. Suppose CSF does not flow freely in 1 ml syringe [Figure 1], we rotate it clockwise/anticlockwise by 90° each time until 360° and see the point at which it comes freely, and it is desirable to give drug at the point where CSF flows freely [Figure 2]. Hence, we keep the hub of spinal needle steady between the thumb and index finger of the left hand, remove 1 ml syringe, and attach the syringe containing spinal drug which is injected at the rate of 0.2 ml/s.
Figure 1: Advik technique – Note that cerebrospinal fluid flow is inadequate in 1 ml syringe although cerebrospinal fluid was present till the hub of spinal needle

Click here to view
Figure 2: Advik technique – one may see “free flow” of cerebrospinal fluid and it is desirable to give spinal drug

Click here to view


Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Shrestha AB, Shrestha CK, Sharma KR, Neupane B. Failure of subarachnoid block in caesarean section. Nepal Med Coll J 2009;11:50-1.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Harrison DA, Langham BT. Spinal anaesthesia for urological surgery. A survey of failure rate, postdural puncture headache and patient satisfaction. Anaesthesia 1992;47:902-3.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Rubin AP, Wildsmith JA, Armitage EN, McClure JH. Spinal anesthesia. Principles and Practice of Regional Anesthesia. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2003.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Drasner K, Rigler ML. Repeat injection after a “failed spinal”: At times, a potentially unsafe practice. Anesthesiology 1991;75:713-4.  Back to cited text no. 4
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
 
Previous article    Next article
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  IN THIS Article
   References
   Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2066    
    Printed88    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded248    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal