Previous article Table of Contents  Next article

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 396-401

A randomized comparative study assessing efficacy of pain versus comfort scores


Department of Anaesthesia, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India

Correspondence Address:
Richa Jain
661-B, Aggar Nagar, Ferozepur Road, Ludhiana - 141 001, Punjab
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/sja.SJA_256_17

Rights and Permissions
Date of Web Publication22-Sep-2017
 

  Abstract 


Context: Use of language with negative emotional content is likely to increase patient's pain and anxiety.
Aims: We designed a single-blinded randomized study to compare pain scores with comfort scores and to determine whether the technique of pain assessment affects patient's perceptions and experience.
Subjects and Methods: After cesarean section, 180 women were randomized before postanaesthesia interview into two groups. Group P women were asked to rate their pain on a 0–10-point verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) for pain while Group C women were asked to rate their comfort on a 0–10-point VNRS for comfort. All women were asked whether the surgical wound was associated with injury or healing. The primary outcomes were to compare the incidence of reported pain and to assess pain severity as measured by a 0–10-point VNRS for pain compared with an equivalent inverted VNRS for comfort. The secondary outcomes were whether the wound was associated with injury or healing.
Statistical Analysis Used: Data were analyzed using Student's t-test and nonparametric Mann–Whitney U-test, performed at a significance level of α =0.05.
Results: In Group P, 62 women (68.9%) reported pain compared with only 49 women (54.4%) in Group C (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between groups for VNRS at rest and on movement. In Group P, thirty women (33.33%) reported sensations as injury compared with only 11 women (12.22%) in Group C (P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Assessment of pain using positive word like comfort decreases its incidence with no effect on its severity when measured by comfort score and also affects patient's postsurgical perceptions.

Keywords: Communication; measurement; pain scores; psychological responses; unconscious perception


How to cite this article:
Jain R, Grewal A. A randomized comparative study assessing efficacy of pain versus comfort scores. Saudi J Anaesth 2017;11:396-401

How to cite this URL:
Jain R, Grewal A. A randomized comparative study assessing efficacy of pain versus comfort scores. Saudi J Anaesth [serial online] 2017 [cited 2020 Jul 8];11:396-401. Available from: http://www.saudija.org/text.asp?2017/11/4/396/215415




    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
Previous article    Next article
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  IN THIS Article
   Abstract
  Introduction
  Subjects and Methods
  Results
  Discussion
  Conclusion
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1823    
    Printed30    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded109    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal