Previous article Table of Contents  Next article

LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 116

In Response: Dexmedetomidine versus propofol in dilatation and curettage: An open-label pilot randomized controlled trial


Department of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, AIIMS, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
G S Tomar
Department of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, 7th Floor, Neuroscience Centre, AIIMS, New Delhi
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1658-354X.169493

Rights and Permissions
Date of Web Publication12-Nov-2015
 


How to cite this article:
Tomar G S. In Response: Dexmedetomidine versus propofol in dilatation and curettage: An open-label pilot randomized controlled trial. Saudi J Anaesth 2016;10:116

How to cite this URL:
Tomar G S. In Response: Dexmedetomidine versus propofol in dilatation and curettage: An open-label pilot randomized controlled trial. Saudi J Anaesth [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Dec 9];10:116. Available from: http://www.saudija.org/text.asp?2016/10/1/116/169493

Sir,

We read with interest article by Sethi et al., [1] in June, 2015 issue of Saudi Journal of Anesthesia. Authors compared patient's and surgeon's satisfaction score and hemodynamics after D and C procedure by using dexmedetomidine infusion and propofol boluses among patients.

We have few queries related to their mentioned statement in methodology and discussion part.

  1. Authors did not measure any type of parameter for analgesia provided in both the groups and still were able to measure patient's and surgeon's satisfaction score. Moreover, the foremost thing to be asked by anesthetist or surgeon from the patient after any surgical or invasive procedure is about the satisfaction in terms of pain control/analgesia.
  2. Did the authors have any rescue analgesia strategy in their methodology? We didn't find any but of rescue sedation. However, in discussion section authors stated that "Group D had higher satisfaction scores both for patients and surgeon. As propofol sedation in this study was associated with lower patient satisfaction and more use of rescue analgesic. [1]" In contrast with an recently published similar (to some extent) study. [2]


 
  References Top

1.
Sethi P, Sindhi S, Verma A, Tulsiani KL. Dexmedetomidine versus propofol in dilatation and curettage: An open-label pilot randomized controlled trial. Saudi J Anaesth 2015;9:258-62.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.
Tomar GS, Singh F, Ganguly S, Gaur N. Is dexmedetomidine better than propofol and fentanyl combination in minor day care procedures? A prospective randomised double-blind study. Indian J Anaesth 2015;59:359-64.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  




 

Top
 
Previous article    Next article
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  IN THIS Article
   References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed795    
    Printed25    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded76    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal