Previous article Table of Contents  Next article

ERRATUM
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 235

0.5% levobupivacaine versus 0.5% ropivacaine: Are they different in ultrasound-guided sciatic block?: Erratum



Correspondence Address:
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1658-354X.152905

Rights and Permissions
Date of Web Publication10-Mar-2015
 


How to cite this article:
. 0.5% levobupivacaine versus 0.5% ropivacaine: Are they different in ultrasound-guided sciatic block?: Erratum. Saudi J Anaesth 2015;9:235

How to cite this URL:
. 0.5% levobupivacaine versus 0.5% ropivacaine: Are they different in ultrasound-guided sciatic block?: Erratum. Saudi J Anaesth [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Sep 29];9:235. Available from: http://www.saudija.org/text.asp?2015/9/2/235/152905

In the article that appeared on page 3-8 of the Saudi Journal of Anesthesia, Vol. 9, No. 1, January-March, 2015 issue [1] there was an error in authors' first and last name. The author names should be as follows:

Pham Dang Charles, Langlois Cécile, Lambert Chantal, Nguyen Jean-Michel, Asehnoune Karim, Lejus Corinne

Accordingly the citation should be as follows:

Pham Dang C, Langlois C, Lambert C, Nguyen JM, Asehnoune K, Lejus C

Abdelazeem EL-Dawlatly
Editor In Chief


 
  References Top

1.
Charles PD, Cécile L, Chantal L, Jean-Michel N, Karim A, Corinne L. 0.5% levobupivacaine versus 0.5% ropivacaine: Are they different in ultrasound-guided sciatic block?. Saudi J Anaesth 2015;9:3-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
    




 

Top
 
Previous article    Next article
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  IN THIS Article
   References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1689    
    Printed16    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded79    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal