Previous article Table of Contents  Next article

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 43-47

The analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy: A randomized controlled study


Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Centre, Civil Hospital Campus, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Correspondence Address:
Beena K Parikh
Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Centre, Civil Hospital Campus, 27, Surel Bunglows, Near Judges Bunglows, Bodakdev, Ahmedabad, Gujarat
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1658-354X.109808

Rights and Permissions
Date of Web Publication30-Mar-2013
 

  Abstract 

Background: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is suitable for lower abdominal surgeries. Blind TAP block has many complications and uncertainty of its effects. Use of ultrasonography increases the safety and efficacy. This study was conducted to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound (USG)-guided TAP block for retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy (RDN). Methods: In a prospective randomized double-blind study, 60 patients undergoing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy were randomly divided into two groups by closed envelope method. At the end of surgery, USG-guided TAP block was given to the patients of both the groups. Study group (group S) received inj. Bupivacaine (0.375%), whereas control group (group C) received normal saline. Inj. Tramadol (1 mg/kg) was given as rescue analgesic at visual analog scale (VAS) more than 3 in any group at rest or on movement. The analgesic efficacy was judged by VAS both at rest and on movement, time to first dose of rescue analgesic, cumulative dose of tramadol, sedation score, and nausea score, which were also noted at 30 min, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h postoperatively. Total tramadol consumption at 24 h was also assessed. Results: Patients in group S had significantly lower VAS score, longer time to first dose of rescue analgesic (547.13±266.96 min vs. 49.17±24.95 min) and lower tramadol consumption (103.8±32.18 mg vs. 235.8±47.5 mg) in 24 h. Conclusion: The USG-guided TAP block is easy to perform and effective as a postoperative analgesic regimen in RDN, with opioids-sparing effect and without any complications.

Keywords: Drugs - bupivacaine and tramadol, retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy, transversus abdominis plane block, ultrasound


How to cite this article:
Parikh BK, Waghmare VT, Shah VR, Mehta T, Butala BP, Parikh GP, Vora KS. The analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy: A randomized controlled study. Saudi J Anaesth 2013;7:43-7

How to cite this URL:
Parikh BK, Waghmare VT, Shah VR, Mehta T, Butala BP, Parikh GP, Vora KS. The analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy: A randomized controlled study. Saudi J Anaesth [serial online] 2013 [cited 2019 Oct 16];7:43-7. Available from: http://www.saudija.org/text.asp?2013/7/1/43/109808


  Introduction Top


In the last two decades, laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) has brought great benefits, enabling patients to recover quickly from surgery and allowing them to return to normal activities. LDN is a unique surgical procedure in which live donors who are healthy volunteers undergo a major surgical trauma that causes postoperative pain and discomfort without any direct therapeutic benefit of the procedure. [1],[2]

The most common approach to postoperative pain relief for LDN is multimodal using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids, and local infiltration of anesthetic. Opioids are effective for treatment of postoperative pain, but can cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, decreased gastrointestinal motility, respiratory depression, and sedation, which further increase the morbidity of the donor. Local infiltration does not relieve deep muscular pain, and NSAIDs are nephrotoxic. [3]

In the last decade, a novel approach to block the abdominal wall neural afferents via the lumbar triangle of Petit has been described by Rafi in 2001, known as transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. [4],[5] However, landmark technique is associated with difficulties like anatomical variation of triangle of Petit, difficulty in palpation of angle in obese patients, and complications like colonic puncture, liver injury, nerve injury, or unpredictable spread of local anesthetic. [6],[7] Hebbard et al. in 2007 have subsequently described the ultrasound (USG)-guided approach to the TAP block. [8.9] Real-time ultrasound provides reliable imaging of three muscular layers of anterolateral abdominal wall and assessment of correct needle placement and local anesthetic injection, thus potentially increasing the success rate and safety of the TAP block compared to the landmark technique.

So, we hypothesized that the TAP block, as a part of multimodal analgesic regimen, would result in decreased opioid (tramadol) consumption and improved analgesia in the first 24 h after retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy (RDN).


  Methods Top


After obtaining approval from the hospital ethical committee and written informed consent, 60 ASA risk I and II patients scheduled for RDN, between 24 and 60 years of age of either sex, were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study. The trial was registered with the local institutional review board (IRB). The trial was carried out between December 2009 and December 2011 at the Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Centre and Institute of Transplantation Sciences (IKDRC-ITS), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. Patients allergic to local anesthetics drugs, opioid addicts, and with psychiatric disorders were excluded from our study. Initial preoperative counseling was done to gain the confidence of the patient, thereby minimizing the emotional component of pain. The nature of the procedure was explained and the patients were taught to assess the intensity of pain using visual analog scale (VAS). Patients were randomly allocated to group S (study group n0=30) and group C (control group n=30) by a block randomization table and closed envelope method, which was unknown to the investigators. The patients, anesthesiologists, and the resident staff providing postoperative care were blinded to group assignment.

All patients received balanced general anesthesia. They were premedicated with inj. Glycopyrrolate (0.004 mg/kg), inj. Fentanyl (2 μg/kg), Ranitidine 50 mg, and inj. Ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg. Induction of anesthesia was achieved with inj. Thiopentone sodium (7 mg/kg). The trachea was intubated 90 seconds after giving vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg bolus. Anesthesia was maintained with O 2 /N 2 O, isoflurane, and maintenance dose of vecuronium. Pulse, electrocardiogram (ECG), non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ), end-tidal CO 2 (ETCO 2 ), and urine output were monitored throughout the procedure. After completion of surgery and before extubation, patients were positioned in the supine position. TAP block was performed by the first investigator with experience of more than 5 years of USG-guided blocks. It was done on the same side of surgery under ultrasonographic guidance with a SonoSite MICRO MAXX portable ultrasound device (SonoSite , Bothell, WA, USA) and a linear 6-13 MHz ultrasound transducer. Once the external oblique abdominis muscle (EOAM), internal oblique abdominis muscle (IOAM), and transversus abdominis muscle (TAM) were visualized at the level of the anterior axillary line between the 12 th rib and the iliac crest [Figure 1], the puncture area and the ultrasound probe were prepared in a sterile manner. After identification of the neuro-facial plane between IOAM and TAM, block was performed with an 18-G Touhy needle. The needle was directed to approach the TAP with "in-plane" USG-guided technique [Figure 2]. Once the tip of the needle was placed in the space between the IOAM and TAM, 25 ml of inj. Bupivacaine (0.375%) or normal saline was injected after negative aspiration, according to the group allocated. The drug was seen spreading in TAP as a dark oval shape [Figure 3]. Inj. Diclofenac sodium 1.5 mg/kg IM was given to every patient before extubation. After completion of the procedure, patients were shifted to the post-anesthetic care unit (PACU).
Figure 1: Ultrasound-guided picture of transversus abdominis plane plane

Click here to view
Figure 2: Technique of USG-guided in-plane transversus abdominis plane block

Click here to view
Figure 3: Visualization of spread of drug

Click here to view


Primary outcome measure in this study was 24-h tramadol consumption. Secondary outcome measures included time for first dose of tramadol, VAS scores, and the associated side effects. Postoperatively, apart from vital data, pain score, sedation and nausea score were recorded. Assessment of pain was done using VAS both at rest and on movement at intervals of 30 min, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively. When the VAS score was more than 3, inj. Tramadol 1 mg/kg was given as a rescue analgesic. Time to first dose of rescue analgesic and total tramadol consumption in 24 h was noted. Side effects due to opioid and complications related to TAP block like subcutaneous bruising and inadvertent vessel puncture were noted. Patients were given inj. Ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg IV before they were administered inj. Tramadol. All postoperative assessments were made by an investigator blinded to the study group.

Primary outcome measure in this study was 24-h tramadol consumption. Secondary outcome measures included time for first dose of tramadol, VAS scores, and the associated side effects.

Statistical analysis

The sample size was calculated on the basis of 24-h tramadol consumption of patient undergoing RDN in an initial pilot study. Mean±standard deviation (SD) of 24-h tramadol consumption in the control and study groups of pilot study was 204±16.73 mg and 179±26 mg, respectively. Based on this, 23 patients per group would be required for an experimental design incorporating two equal groups, using α=0.05 and a power of 95%.

Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software, version 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA)., Data were expressed as mean±SD for continuous variables and no. (%) for categorical variables. Continuous variables were compared using independent two-sample t-test. Fisher exact test and Chi-square analysis were used for comparing categorical data. P<0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.


  Results Top


Sixty-two patients were enrolled in the study. In the study group, one patient was excluded due to poor window on ultrasound due to previous surgical scar, while in the control group, one patient withdrew from the study. This prospective study was carried out in 60 ASA I and II patients, who underwent left-sided RDN. They were randomly divided into two different groups. Group S patients received TAP block with Bupivacaine (0.375%) 25 ml. Group C patients received TAP block with placebo (i.e., with normal saline) 25 ml. Both groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, weight, and height [Table 1].
Table 1: Demographic data

Click here to view


VAS score at rest and on movement was higher in the control group as compared to the study group at all the time intervals, and it was significantly higher at 30 min, 2, 4, 6, and 12 h, and the graphs in [Figure 4] and [Figure 5] show that pain score was decreased at 24 h in both the groups.
Figure 4: Graph depicting visual analog scale scores at rest

Click here to view
Figure 5: Graph depicting visual analog scale scores on movement

Click here to view


First dose of rescue analgesia required in group S was at 547.133±266.9 min and in group C was at 49.17±24.95 min, which was statistically significant. Total dose of tramadol consumption in group S was 103.83±32.18 mg and in group C was 235.83±47 mg, which showed that tramadol consumption was significantly decreased in group S [Table 2]. There was no statistically significant difference in both the groups in sedation and nausea score. Hemodynamically, both the groups were comparable all the time. No complications related to the TAP block technique were observed in both the groups.
Table 2: Time for first dose of rescue analgesia and total tramadol consumption in 24 h

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The cause of pain after laparoscopic procedure is multifactorial. In LDN, pain may be because of insertion of the ports and due to the lower abdominal incision of 6-9 cm for the extraction of the kidney. [3] This pain is mostly parietal in origin and conducted by the lower intercostal nerves and iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerves (i.e., T10-L1). Pelvic organ nociception or diaphragmatic irritation from residual pnemoperitoneum can lead to shoulder tip discomfort, but this is more common in transperitoneal laparoscopic surgery than retroperitoneoscopic surgery. Ureteric colic and urinary catheter discomfort may also contribute to the development of postoperative pain in these patients. [2]

The use of USG-guided sensory block of anterior abdominal wall with local anesthesia for postoperative pain relief is an attractive method. USG-guided TAP block has been shown to be a promising technique for providing analgesia after surgery involving anterior abdominal wall. [5],[8],[9] Considering the intraoperative spillage or leaking of the local analgesic from the TAP plane, and to prolong the analgesic effect, we decided to give USG-guided TAP block postoperatively.

VAS score was low both at rest and on movement in group S as compared to group C throughout 24 h; however, it was statistically significantly low at 30 min, 2, 4, 6, and 12 h [Figure 2] and [Figure 3]. This was similar to the observations of a study performed by Mc Donnell et al.[10] on cesarean section delivery, where VAS at rest and on movement was found to be significantly low till 12 h in patients who had received TAP block with local anesthetic. Study performed by Niraj et al.[11] on open appendicectomy and Neerja Bharti et al.[12] on colorectal surgery also showed similar results.

Time to first dose of rescue analgesia (i.e., tramadol) was statistically significantly prolonged in group S (547.133±266.962 min) compared to group C (49.17±24.96 min) [Table 2]. In studies performed by Mc Donnell et al.[10] and D. Belavy et al.[13] on cesarean section, the time to first analgesic demand was 3-4 h after completion of the surgical procedure, which was not similar to our study. This difference may be attributed to the TAP block given before the surgery, whereas we had given the TAP block at the end of surgery. Also, one time bolus injections of local anesthetics can provide narcotic-limiting pain relief for 4-8 h after the operation; however, it was about 12 h in our study. Other studies also demonstrated that a single shot TAP technique can produce effective analgesia for 36-48 h, attributing it to relatively poor vascularity and therefore slow drug clearance. [14]

One important measure of analgesic efficacy in our study was the requirement of opioid analgesic during the first 24 h. The 24-h consumption of total tramadol was 56% less in group S as compared to that in group C [Table 2]. Our study results are comparable with those of Dawlatly et al.[7] who showed 55% decrease in opioid requirement after USG-guided TAP block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Niraj et al.[11] showed 45% decrease in opioid requirement with USG-guided TAP block in open appendicectomy.

When the block is performed by the so-called "pop" or "double pop" technique in the anatomical area of the Petit triangle, inadvertent needle position can result in severe complications like bowel puncture, nerve injury, and puncture of the liver. Liver injury with landmark technique has been reported in a short stature woman whose liver was enlarged. [6] We did not observe any of these complications as we performed USG-guided block, which allowed real-time visualization of needle tip and relevant anatomical structures, increasing the margin of safety.

Another important concern is the local anesthetic toxicity, particularly when bilateral blocks are performed, as administration of local anesthetic between fascia layers is associated with fast absorption kinetics. TAP block has been shown to cause systemic toxicity if the local anesthetic spills over into the adjacent muscles. [15] We did not encounter this complication as the surgical procedure selected required unilateral block and we did not cross the toxic dose of Bupivacaine. Hemodynamic parameters like heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), SaO2, and respiratory rate (RR) remained comparable in both the groups at all the time intervals.

Opioid-related side effects like sedation, nausea, and vomiting are related to the dose of opioids. In our study, sedation score as well as nausea and vomiting score were low and comparable in both the groups in spite of the increased need of opioids. This may be due to the use of tramadol, which is less sedative than morphine, and the prophylactic use of ondansetron.

Limitations to our study were that all the blocks were performed by the same person, so the results could not be generalized. Secondly, we studied the postoperative pain for only 24 h as the patients were shifted to oral analgesics after 24 h of laparoscopic RDN.

From this, we conclude that USG-guided TAP block is a promising new technique for postoperative pain management in RDN as a part of multimodal analgesia without any complications. Further studies are warranted to support these findings before establishing it in routine clinical practice in different types of surgical procedures.

 
  References Top

1.Biglarnia AR, Tufveson G, Lorant T, Lennmyr F, Wadstrom, J. Efficacy and safety of continuous local infusion of Ropivacaine after Retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Am J Transplant 2011;11:93-100.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Modi P. Retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy for retroaortic renal vein draining into left common iliac vein. Urology 2008;71:964-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Jancovic Z, Eyre L, Kocarev M. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: Post operative pain treatment. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008;25:603-4.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Rafi A. Abdominal field block: A new approach via the lumbar triangle. Anaesthesia 2001;56:1024-6.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.McDonnell JG, O'Donnell B, Curley G, Heffernan A, Power C, Laffey JG. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:193-7.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Farooq M, Carey M. A case of liver trauma with a blunt regional anesthesia needle while performing transversus abdominis plane block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2008;33:274-5.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.El-Dawlatly A, Turkistani A, Kettner SC, Machata AM, Delvi MB, Thallaj A, et al. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block: Description of a new technique and comparison with conventional systemic analgesia during laparoscopic cholecystectomy Br J Anaesth 2009;102:763-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Hebbard P, Fujiwara Y, Shibata Y, Royse C. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. Anaesth Intensive Care 2007;35:616-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Tran TM, Ivanusic JJ, Hebbard P, Barrington MJ. Determination of spread of injectate after ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block: A cadaveric study. Br J Anaesth 2009;102:123-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.McDonnell J, Curley G, Carney J, Benton A, Costello J, Maharaj C, et al. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2008;106:186-91.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Niraj G, Searle A, Mathews M, Misra V, Baban M, Kiani S, et al. Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transverses abdominis plane block in patients undergoing open appendicectomy. Br J Anaesth 2009;103:601-5.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Bharti N, Kumar P, Bala I, Gupta V. The efficacy of a novel approach to transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after colorectal surgery. Anesth Analg 2011;112:1504-8.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Belavy D, Cowlishaw PJ, Howes M, Phillips F. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after caesarean delivery. Br J Anaesth 2009;103:726-30.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.O'Donnell BD, McDonnell JG, McShane AJ. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in open retropubic prostatectomy. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2006;31:91.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Kato N, Fujiwara Y, Harato M, Kurokawa S, Harada J, Shibata Y, et al. Serum concentration of lidocaine after transversus abdominis plane block. B J Anesth 2009;23:298-300.  Back to cited text no. 15
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]


This article has been cited by
1 Ultrasound-guided subcostal transversus abdominis plane blocks with liposomal bupivacaine vs. non-liposomal bupivacaine for postoperative pain control after laparoscopic hand-assisted donor nephrectomy: a prospective randomised observer-blinded study
J. L. Hutchins,R. Kesha,F. Blanco,T. Dunn,R. Hochhalter
Anaesthesia. 2016;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Unilateral Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block After Nephrectomy; Postoperative Pain and Use of Opioids
Nessn H. Azawi,Karina Sif Sondergaard Mosholt,Mikkel Fode
Nephro-Urology Monthly. 2016; In Press(In Press)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 The Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Adult Patients
Moira Baeriswyl,Kyle R. Kirkham,Christian Kern,Eric Albrecht
Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2015; 121(6): 1640
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Evolution of the Transversus Abdominis Plane Block and its Role in Postoperative Analgesia
Jonathan Lissauer,Kenneth Mancuso,Christopher Merritt,Amit Prabhakar,Alan David Kaye,Richard D. Urman
Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Eficacia analgésica del bloqueo del plano transverso del abdomen ecoguiado-revisión sistemática
Javier Ripollés Melchor,Sandra Marmaña Mezquita,Alfredo Abad Gurumeta,José María Calvo Vecino
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol). 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Eficácia analgésica do bloqueio ecoguiado do plano transverso do abdome – Revisão sistemática
Javier Ripollés Melchor,Sandra Marmaña Mezquita,Alfredo Abad Gurumeta,José María Calvo Vecino
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Analgesic efficacy of the ultrasound-guided blockade of the transversus abdominis plane – a systematic review
Javier Ripollés Melchor,Sandra Marmaña Mezquita,Alfredo Abad Gurumeta,José María Calvo Vecino
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition). 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Intraoperative Management for Abdominal Organ Transplantation
Michael D. Spiro,Helge Eilers
Anesthesiology Clinics. 2013;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
Previous article    Next article
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  IN THIS Article
   Abstract
  Introduction
  Methods
  Results
  Discussion
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed5015    
    Printed106    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded260    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 8    

Recommend this journal